Fed to propose changes to crisis-era rule that limited bank risky trading
Jun 3, 2018It was that risky activity that led to multibillion-dollar bailouts of several big U.S. banks during the financial crisis. The Fed’s proposal is the latest in a steady stream of efforts by the Trump administration to roll back reforms made by the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, the law enacted after the financial crisis. The banks, and the Trump administration, blame Dodd-Frank for stifling economic growth, despite more banks being profitable now than at any time in the last twenty years. Read: After tax cuts, more banks are profitable than at any time in the past two decades The Volcker Rule is supposed to limit proprietary trading, defined by law as “engaging as a principal to trade debt and equity securities, commodities, derivatives, or other financial instruments for the trading account of a banking organization or supervised nonbank financial company.” Doug Landy, a partner with law firm Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy and a key advisor to banks during the financial crisis and after, told MarketWatch that the Fed’s revisions to the Volcker rule will be “incremental, not revolutionary.” That won’t appease critics. Andy Green, managing director of economic policy for the Center for American Progress, told MarketWatch, “Unfortunately, from all indications, the Volcker 2.0 proposal hacks away at the principle that banks ought to be in the business of serving their customers and the real economy. Moreover, at a time in the economic cycle when regulators ought to be guarding against macroprudential risks to jobs and economic growth – and the evidence is that liquidity in the bond markets is as good as or better than prior to the crisis – making it easier for banks to engage in swing-for-the-fence bets seems very hard to justify from a rational basis.” Banks have been saying since 2013, when the Volcker Rule was enacted, that it’s too vague, making compliance too difficult. In the meantime, the biggest banks have diges...